1. SUMMARY OF CASE: Advocate Adi represents the Defendant, accused of murder under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code, with the alleged act occurring on July 28, 2026. Advocate Ali, representing the Prosecution, claims the act was premeditated and unjustifiable. The Defense argues that the act was in self-defense under Section 96 of the PPC, asserting that the deceased initiated the conflict with a knife. 2. EVALUATION OF PROSECUTION'S CASE (ADVOCATE ALI): Advocate Ali asserts that the evidence, including forensic findings and witness testimonies, clearly indicates the Defendant's intent to kill. The Prosecution argues that the Defendant's actions were not in self-defense but rather an unlawful response to the threat posed by the deceased. 3. EVALUATION OF DEFENSE'S CASE (ADVOCATE ADI): Advocate Adi contends that the Defendant acted in self-defense, as the deceased had previously threatened the Defendant and initiated the conflict with a knife. The Defense argues that the act was a necessary response to an immediate threat to the Defendant's life, as per Section 96 of the PPC. 4. STATUTORY APPLICATION: The Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Defendant's actions were not in self-defense but were unlawful. The Defense, on the other hand, only needs to raise a plausible claim of self-defense. If the Prosecution fails to disprove self-defense beyond reasonable doubt, the accused must be acquitted under Section 265-K CrPC. 5. FINAL VERDICT & ORDER: The Defense has raised a plausible claim of self-defense. The Prosecution has failed to disprove it beyond reasonable doubt. The accused must be acquitted under Section 265-K CrPC.